<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New version of CFJSON</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epiphantastic.com/2007/02/04/new-version-of-cfjson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epiphantastic.com/2007/02/04/new-version-of-cfjson/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 02:34:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.epiphantastic.com/2007/02/04/new-version-of-cfjson/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 07:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epiphantastic.com/?p=14#comment-15</guid>
		<description>ah, I see. Thanks and good job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah, I see. Thanks and good job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CFJSON has a new home</title>
		<link>http://www.epiphantastic.com/2007/02/04/new-version-of-cfjson/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>CFJSON has a new home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epiphantastic.com/?p=14#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote CFJSON back in May 2005, and I&#8217;m happy to see that Thomas Messier has given it a new home, and managed to roll quite a few pending bug fixes into a new 1.6 release. If you use CFJSON head over and get the new release. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote CFJSON back in May 2005, and I&#8217;m happy to see that Thomas Messier has given it a new home, and managed to roll quite a few pending bug fixes into a new 1.6 release. If you use CFJSON head over and get the new release. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.epiphantastic.com/2007/02/04/new-version-of-cfjson/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epiphantastic.com/?p=14#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Actually, if I understand your request correctly, that has been taken care of. There was a piece of code that made forced the key names to upper case that has been removed. To ensure that your struct keys are encoded correctly from CF to JSON, make sure you use struct[&quot;key&quot;] notation rather than struct.key notation. The latter will result in an uppercase key no matter how you write it, whereas the fomer will preserve the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, if I understand your request correctly, that has been taken care of. There was a piece of code that made forced the key names to upper case that has been removed. To ensure that your struct keys are encoded correctly from CF to JSON, make sure you use struct["key"] notation rather than struct.key notation. The latter will result in an uppercase key no matter how you write it, whereas the fomer will preserve the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.epiphantastic.com/2007/02/04/new-version-of-cfjson/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epiphantastic.com/?p=14#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Awesome! My first feature request is a setting to allow us to ensure that variable names retain their case</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! My first feature request is a setting to allow us to ensure that variable names retain their case</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

